Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Teri's avatar

This is so true! And at the end of the day, 9k a year isn’t enough to make ends meet. We need a bigger pie for childcare!

Nancy Reddy's avatar

Thank you for this smart take on this proposal, Rebecca! The cynical part of me assumes that Vance knows this proposal will go nowhere, but believes there's symbolic value in saying he's supported traditional families blah blah. (Which is not shade on parents who stay home with their kids! I just don't think this is actually a serious, well-designed policy to do even that.)

This feels like another case where, if we had meaningful paid leave, we'd be having a totally different conversation. Most parents don't want to go back to work at six weeks or whatever paltry leave they might be able to get--but a lot of parents would like to be back at work by a year or so, I'd think! Vance's policy seems to instead assume that "stay at home parent" is a permanent identity, which just isn't really what happens in a lot of cases, right?

No posts

Ready for more?